Their was no India before 1857.
Handling how Columbus and Europeans used the words "India" "Indians"
It was used to describe a part of the continental land mass known now as Asia.
"All of southern and eastern asia was referred to as india by the europeans."
East Asians and South Asians are not all Indians, most of them have nothing to do with India.
Conclusion: It was called india but is not really india.
India even right now (2000-2020) is a fake psuedo country that was illegally made without the consent of everyone. The land of sakas is different, south indians dont like having a unity with india. Indians want to seperate from eachother and don't like being together.
India is 562 different countries combined into one:
"If he wasn’t there, then today India would have been divided into 562 small countries and you would need a visa to go to each country."
https://scroll.in/article/900285/how-british-viceroy-mountbatten-helped-vallabhbhai-patel-integrate-princely-states-into-indian-union
Multiple states were sovereign and did not want to join the shithole india:
https://indianexpress.com/article/research/five-states-that-refused-to-join-india-after-independence/ Among them Jodhpur, Hyderabad, and Bhopal also existed.
Bharat refers to a small kingdom in the Indo-Gangetic Plain. People of South India never agreed to the name bharat neither did those in the northwest/north east, or the other western parts of India. Other claims are that it is derived from the name of a king named Bharata however their is no evidence that this man ever ruled even 33 percent of what is currently known as India.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Names_for_India
India is 562 different countries combined into one:
"If he wasn’t there, then today India would have been divided into 562 small countries and you would need a visa to go to each country."
https://scroll.in/article/900285/how-british-viceroy-mountbatten-helped-vallabhbhai-patel-integrate-princely-states-into-indian-union
Multiple states were sovereign and did not want to join the shithole india:
https://indianexpress.com/article/research/five-states-that-refused-to-join-india-after-independence/ Among them Jodhpur, Hyderabad, and Bhopal also existed.
Bharat refers to a small kingdom in the Indo-Gangetic Plain. People of South India never agreed to the name bharat neither did those in the northwest/north east, or the other western parts of India. Other claims are that it is derived from the name of a king named Bharata however their is no evidence that this man ever ruled even 33 percent of what is currently known as India.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Names_for_India
India as a name is a completely foreign concept created by Columbus meaning the country now known as India does not have a native name or identity. India is created by the British and then when these losers begged the british for freedom it was given in donation & impotent indians accepted this trash country.
Marathas, Cholas, Rajputs none of them called eachother citizens of bharat or indians.
Akhand Bharat and Bharatvarsh along with Aryavarth (land of the Aryans) each of them are fraud concepts.
What really counts is not the words of the invaders but instead the words of people who actually lived in the region so they can introduce themselves and tell the world what they considered their country and whether they agree to label themselves as indians or not. But since all of them are dead (the men, women, children who lived before the invasions) we have no right to call this place india, hindustan/hindostan or bharat.
What really counts is not the words of the invaders but instead the words of people who actually lived in the region so they can introduce themselves and tell the world what they considered their country and whether they agree to label themselves as indians or not. But since all of them are dead (the men, women, children who lived before the invasions) we have no right to call this place india, hindustan/hindostan or bharat.
Comments
Post a Comment